|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 24, 2021 8:08:52 GMT -5
I see a lot of fluff there, people getting buried in the numbers and not watching the game. Our D numbers are good because we have first of all great goaltending but also great support from the forwards collapsing down to keep teams on the perimeter. Yes it’s something we do every year but this year we are circling the wagons more and getting hemmed in for longer stretches. Our D pairs are not as good, they are young, inexperienced, very banged up right now and we don’t recover pucks well enough. When we do recover pucks our decision making is bad, our execution is bad and our outlet passes go for icing or get picked off. Also way too many lateral passes on the break outs, sometimes they picked off but also it makes our team play a slower game. Not enough north south hockey with players getting the puck in full stride.
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Mar 24, 2021 8:37:43 GMT -5
Jake DeBrusk does not take slights well. He was ripping mad after coach Bruce Cassidy made him a healthy scratch on March 9 against the Islanders. DeBrusk is well aware of media buzz that has his name active in trade chatter.
All of this fuels the Bruins’ No. 1 worry about trading the 2015 first-rounder: After dealing him at depressed value, a motivated DeBrusk becomes the consistent scoring threat elsewhere that his current employer needs him to be now.
“It feels like everyone thinks I’m kind of done here,” DeBrusk said following the Bruins’ 4-0 win over the Rangers on March 11.
DeBrusk has a history of short-term spikes after things go off the rails. On March 11, his first game following his healthy scratch, DeBrusk found a soft spot in the Rangers’ coverage, put his stick down and slammed home a David Krejci feed. It was his first five-on-five goal of the year. It looked so easy.
“Even more than his goal, I liked his details,” Brad Marchand said after the win. “He was stopping on pucks. He was competing hard. Finishing checks. Blocking shots. That’s how he has to play. He’s going to score when he gets in position. But it’s the other areas of his game, when he plays like that, he’s a phenomenal player.”
Earlier this season, DeBrusk missed five games because of a lower-body injury. He returned on Feb. 10, also against the Rangers. DeBrusk, playing on the third line with Anders Bjork and Charlie Coyle, let 14 pucks loose, hitting the net with seven of them.
“I’d like to see that every night — he has that mentality no matter who his centerman or winger is,” coach Bruce Cassidy said after the 3-2 overtime win.
The problem, however, is the valleys that have accompanied the peaks.
In 21 games, DeBrusk has scored three goals, two of them on the power play. He is averaging 0.23 goals per 60 minutes of five-on-five play, according to Natural Stat Trick. This places him, as of Monday, 280th among 313 forwards with 250 or more minutes.
That DeBrusk is falling short of his $3.675 million annual payday comes in conjunction with the collapse of the second line. Ondrej Kase, DeBrusk’s projected wingman, has not been seen since Game 2 after taking a high hit from New Jersey’s Miles Wood. Krejci is coming off a three-assist bump against Buffalo last Thursday, but the No. 2 pivot has not consistently initiated even-strength offense. Krejci’s next five-on-five goal will be his first.
The disappearance of the second line compounds the blue-line injuries that have slowed down the breakout. They may be the two primary factors in the Bruins’ sum of 44 five-on-five goals, fourth-fewest in the league.
This is not what the Bruins expected from DeBrusk. The Bruins believe a 40-goal season is within the left wing’s powers because of his fearlessness, foot speed and scoring touch. Projection and reality, however, have not aligned.
The conclusion the Bruins may reach is that DeBrusk serves them best in a trade. If so, they would be trading low. No opposing general manager would put his top cards on the table. The Bruins’ best bet would be receiving a similarly underperforming player.
The other issue is the possibility of a DeBrusk explosion.
Trades can shock young players awake to a greater degree than healthy scratches, benches and one-on-one meetings. Tyler Seguin was jolted like never before when the Bruins traded him to Dallas on July 4, 2013. The following season, Seguin became a point-per-game player for the first time in his career.
Reilly Smith, one of the players that arrived in the Seguin package, scored 51 points as a first-year Bruin. After he fell to 40 points in 2014-15, the Bruins traded Smith and Marc Savard’s contract to Florida for Jimmy Hayes. The first-year Panther rebounded to a 50-point season following the trade. Frank Vatrano, wheeled to Florida for a third-round pick, scored 24 goals in his first season in Sunrise.
There are other youngsters who spin their tires after being moved. Danton Heinen, Ryan Donato and Ryan Spooner never popped for their acquiring clubs.
Whether DeBrusk would fit the former or latter category is difficult to project. But DeBrusk has a short-term history of motivated play. He can make scoring look easy.
On Thursday against Buffalo, DeBrusk batted the pop-up rebound of a David Pastrnak one-timer past Carter Hutton for his second power-play goal of the year. It is hard to have your back to the net, track a mid-air puck, turn your body, adjust your hands and bunt in a goal. DeBrusk made it look natural.
The Bruins are not in a position to give such an asset away.
“When he’s taking care of that, he’s a great player,” Marchand said of the intangibles of DeBrusk’s game. “We need that out of him. We need him to be a big player if we’re going to be a dangerous team and compete for a Cup.”
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 24, 2021 9:26:28 GMT -5
Jake DeBrusk does not take slights well. He was ripping mad after coach Bruce Cassidy made him a healthy scratch on March 9 against the Islanders. DeBrusk is well aware of media buzz that has his name active in trade chatter. All of this fuels the Bruins’ No. 1 worry about trading the 2015 first-rounder: After dealing him at depressed value, a motivated DeBrusk becomes the consistent scoring threat elsewhere that his current employer needs him to be now. “It feels like everyone thinks I’m kind of done here,” DeBrusk said following the Bruins’ 4-0 win over the Rangers on March 11. DeBrusk has a history of short-term spikes after things go off the rails. On March 11, his first game following his healthy scratch, DeBrusk found a soft spot in the Rangers’ coverage, put his stick down and slammed home a David Krejci feed. It was his first five-on-five goal of the year. It looked so easy. “Even more than his goal, I liked his details,” Brad Marchand said after the win. “He was stopping on pucks. He was competing hard. Finishing checks. Blocking shots. That’s how he has to play. He’s going to score when he gets in position. But it’s the other areas of his game, when he plays like that, he’s a phenomenal player.” Earlier this season, DeBrusk missed five games because of a lower-body injury. He returned on Feb. 10, also against the Rangers. DeBrusk, playing on the third line with Anders Bjork and Charlie Coyle, let 14 pucks loose, hitting the net with seven of them. “I’d like to see that every night — he has that mentality no matter who his centerman or winger is,” coach Bruce Cassidy said after the 3-2 overtime win. The problem, however, is the valleys that have accompanied the peaks. In 21 games, DeBrusk has scored three goals, two of them on the power play. He is averaging 0.23 goals per 60 minutes of five-on-five play, according to Natural Stat Trick. This places him, as of Monday, 280th among 313 forwards with 250 or more minutes. That DeBrusk is falling short of his $3.675 million annual payday comes in conjunction with the collapse of the second line. Ondrej Kase, DeBrusk’s projected wingman, has not been seen since Game 2 after taking a high hit from New Jersey’s Miles Wood. Krejci is coming off a three-assist bump against Buffalo last Thursday, but the No. 2 pivot has not consistently initiated even-strength offense. Krejci’s next five-on-five goal will be his first. The disappearance of the second line compounds the blue-line injuries that have slowed down the breakout. They may be the two primary factors in the Bruins’ sum of 44 five-on-five goals, fourth-fewest in the league. This is not what the Bruins expected from DeBrusk. The Bruins believe a 40-goal season is within the left wing’s powers because of his fearlessness, foot speed and scoring touch. Projection and reality, however, have not aligned. The conclusion the Bruins may reach is that DeBrusk serves them best in a trade. If so, they would be trading low. No opposing general manager would put his top cards on the table. The Bruins’ best bet would be receiving a similarly underperforming player. The other issue is the possibility of a DeBrusk explosion. Trades can shock young players awake to a greater degree than healthy scratches, benches and one-on-one meetings. Tyler Seguin was jolted like never before when the Bruins traded him to Dallas on July 4, 2013. The following season, Seguin became a point-per-game player for the first time in his career. Reilly Smith, one of the players that arrived in the Seguin package, scored 51 points as a first-year Bruin. After he fell to 40 points in 2014-15, the Bruins traded Smith and Marc Savard’s contract to Florida for Jimmy Hayes. The first-year Panther rebounded to a 50-point season following the trade. Frank Vatrano, wheeled to Florida for a third-round pick, scored 24 goals in his first season in Sunrise. There are other youngsters who spin their tires after being moved. Danton Heinen, Ryan Donato and Ryan Spooner never popped for their acquiring clubs. Whether DeBrusk would fit the former or latter category is difficult to project. But DeBrusk has a short-term history of motivated play. He can make scoring look easy. On Thursday against Buffalo, DeBrusk batted the pop-up rebound of a David Pastrnak one-timer past Carter Hutton for his second power-play goal of the year. It is hard to have your back to the net, track a mid-air puck, turn your body, adjust your hands and bunt in a goal. DeBrusk made it look natural. The Bruins are not in a position to give such an asset away. “When he’s taking care of that, he’s a great player,” Marchand said of the intangibles of DeBrusk’s game. “We need that out of him. We need him to be a big player if we’re going to be a dangerous team and compete for a Cup.” He needs to stop looking to the rafters when scores a goal and stop acting like it’s his first goal ever. He’s putting too much emphasis on “the goal” vs playing the right way to make him and his line successful. Stopping on pucks and winning puck battles would be a great start. He really should watch video of Marchand on the forecheck, in the corners and basically having a plan when he turns over a puck. When Marchand wins a puck in the offensive end corner he already has an idea of where both Bergeron and Pasta are going to be, Debrusk has to have a plan before he even goes into the corner.
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Mar 24, 2021 10:07:52 GMT -5
Jake DeBrusk does not take slights well. He was ripping mad after coach Bruce Cassidy made him a healthy scratch on March 9 against the Islanders. DeBrusk is well aware of media buzz that has his name active in trade chatter. All of this fuels the Bruins’ No. 1 worry about trading the 2015 first-rounder: After dealing him at depressed value, a motivated DeBrusk becomes the consistent scoring threat elsewhere that his current employer needs him to be now. “It feels like everyone thinks I’m kind of done here,” DeBrusk said following the Bruins’ 4-0 win over the Rangers on March 11. DeBrusk has a history of short-term spikes after things go off the rails. On March 11, his first game following his healthy scratch, DeBrusk found a soft spot in the Rangers’ coverage, put his stick down and slammed home a David Krejci feed. It was his first five-on-five goal of the year. It looked so easy. “Even more than his goal, I liked his details,” Brad Marchand said after the win. “He was stopping on pucks. He was competing hard. Finishing checks. Blocking shots. That’s how he has to play. He’s going to score when he gets in position. But it’s the other areas of his game, when he plays like that, he’s a phenomenal player.” Earlier this season, DeBrusk missed five games because of a lower-body injury. He returned on Feb. 10, also against the Rangers. DeBrusk, playing on the third line with Anders Bjork and Charlie Coyle, let 14 pucks loose, hitting the net with seven of them. “I’d like to see that every night — he has that mentality no matter who his centerman or winger is,” coach Bruce Cassidy said after the 3-2 overtime win. The problem, however, is the valleys that have accompanied the peaks. In 21 games, DeBrusk has scored three goals, two of them on the power play. He is averaging 0.23 goals per 60 minutes of five-on-five play, according to Natural Stat Trick. This places him, as of Monday, 280th among 313 forwards with 250 or more minutes. That DeBrusk is falling short of his $3.675 million annual payday comes in conjunction with the collapse of the second line. Ondrej Kase, DeBrusk’s projected wingman, has not been seen since Game 2 after taking a high hit from New Jersey’s Miles Wood. Krejci is coming off a three-assist bump against Buffalo last Thursday, but the No. 2 pivot has not consistently initiated even-strength offense. Krejci’s next five-on-five goal will be his first. The disappearance of the second line compounds the blue-line injuries that have slowed down the breakout. They may be the two primary factors in the Bruins’ sum of 44 five-on-five goals, fourth-fewest in the league. This is not what the Bruins expected from DeBrusk. The Bruins believe a 40-goal season is within the left wing’s powers because of his fearlessness, foot speed and scoring touch. Projection and reality, however, have not aligned. The conclusion the Bruins may reach is that DeBrusk serves them best in a trade. If so, they would be trading low. No opposing general manager would put his top cards on the table. The Bruins’ best bet would be receiving a similarly underperforming player. The other issue is the possibility of a DeBrusk explosion. Trades can shock young players awake to a greater degree than healthy scratches, benches and one-on-one meetings. Tyler Seguin was jolted like never before when the Bruins traded him to Dallas on July 4, 2013. The following season, Seguin became a point-per-game player for the first time in his career. Reilly Smith, one of the players that arrived in the Seguin package, scored 51 points as a first-year Bruin. After he fell to 40 points in 2014-15, the Bruins traded Smith and Marc Savard’s contract to Florida for Jimmy Hayes. The first-year Panther rebounded to a 50-point season following the trade. Frank Vatrano, wheeled to Florida for a third-round pick, scored 24 goals in his first season in Sunrise. There are other youngsters who spin their tires after being moved. Danton Heinen, Ryan Donato and Ryan Spooner never popped for their acquiring clubs. Whether DeBrusk would fit the former or latter category is difficult to project. But DeBrusk has a short-term history of motivated play. He can make scoring look easy. On Thursday against Buffalo, DeBrusk batted the pop-up rebound of a David Pastrnak one-timer past Carter Hutton for his second power-play goal of the year. It is hard to have your back to the net, track a mid-air puck, turn your body, adjust your hands and bunt in a goal. DeBrusk made it look natural. The Bruins are not in a position to give such an asset away. “When he’s taking care of that, he’s a great player,” Marchand said of the intangibles of DeBrusk’s game. “We need that out of him. We need him to be a big player if we’re going to be a dangerous team and compete for a Cup.” He needs to stop looking to the rafters when scores a goal and stop acting like it’s his first goal ever. He’s putting too much emphasis on “the goal” vs playing the right way to make him and his line successful. Stopping on pucks and winning puck battles would be a great start. He really should watch video of Marchand on the forecheck, in the corners and basically having a plan when he turns over a puck. When Marchand wins a puck in the offensive end corner he already has an idea of where both Bergeron and Pasta are going to be, Debrusk has to have a plan before he even goes into the corner. I am not I have eve seen him stop on a forecheck or when chasing somebody. He is the biggest banana peeler on the team.
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 24, 2021 10:33:14 GMT -5
He needs to stop looking to the rafters when scores a goal and stop acting like it’s his first goal ever. He’s putting too much emphasis on “the goal” vs playing the right way to make him and his line successful. Stopping on pucks and winning puck battles would be a great start. He really should watch video of Marchand on the forecheck, in the corners and basically having a plan when he turns over a puck. When Marchand wins a puck in the offensive end corner he already has an idea of where both Bergeron and Pasta are going to be, Debrusk has to have a plan before he even goes into the corner. I am not I have eve seen him stop on a forecheck or when chasing somebody. He is the biggest banana peeler on the team. I like “You are what you is. You is what you am, a cow don’t make ham”.
|
|
|
Post by crafar01 on Mar 24, 2021 20:20:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Mar 25, 2021 6:50:03 GMT -5
Jake may say all the right things but he doesn't back up his talk.
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 25, 2021 11:38:51 GMT -5
Jake may say all the right things but he doesn't back up his talk. I spend a lot of time yelling at Jake through my TV but unless somebody is ponying up a healthy offer I’d just keep him. His value is already rock bottom so I wouldn’t take a chance on giving him away and watching him turn into a star.
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Mar 25, 2021 11:51:17 GMT -5
Jake may say all the right things but he doesn't back up his talk. I spend a lot of time yelling at Jake through my TV but unless somebody is ponying up a healthy offer I’d just keep him. His value is already rock bottom so I wouldn’t take a chance on giving him away and watching him turn into a star. That is the problem if you trade him. Does he turn into Reilly Smith/Tyler Seguin or does he turn into Ryan Donato/Ryan Spooner.
|
|
|
Post by nfld77 on Mar 25, 2021 14:01:16 GMT -5
Jake may say all the right things but he doesn't back up his talk. I spend a lot of time yelling at Jake through my TV but unless somebody is ponying up a healthy offer I’d just keep him. His value is already rock bottom so I wouldn’t take a chance on giving him away and watching him turn into a star. That's why I would hate to lose Lauko..
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 25, 2021 15:37:06 GMT -5
I spend a lot of time yelling at Jake through my TV but unless somebody is ponying up a healthy offer I’d just keep him. His value is already rock bottom so I wouldn’t take a chance on giving him away and watching him turn into a star. That's why I would hate to lose Lauko.. I actually think it would be a travesty to overpay to bring in a player this year. This time of year every deal is an overpayment for the buyer. I wish our guys the best but we have too many holes to fill.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Mar 25, 2021 16:47:18 GMT -5
That's why I would hate to lose Lauko.. I actually think it would be a travesty to overpay to bring in a player this year. This time of year every deal is an overpayment for the buyer. I wish our guys the best but we have too many holes to fill. While I’m not a fan of trading with the Sabres Eric Staal in my mind would be a good fit here along with Savard from the Jackets . Both would be rentals both are salty Players that excel in post season . Do we lose picks sure and a prospect sure and maybe a roster player ( Kuraly Wagner Bjork) maybe but are Captain deserves another chance No ?
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Mar 25, 2021 18:04:03 GMT -5
I actually think it would be a travesty to overpay to bring in a player this year. This time of year every deal is an overpayment for the buyer. I wish our guys the best but we have too many holes to fill. While I’m not a fan of trading with the Sabres Eric Staal in my mind would be a good fit here along with Savard from the Jackets . Both would be rentals both are salty Players that excel in post season . Do we lose picks sure and a prospect sure and maybe a roster player ( Kuraly Wagner Bjork) maybe but are Captain deserves another chance No ? That’s fair if the cost isn’t too high. I actually like the idea of Staal and Savard. I just don’t want to go get a Hall type name and pay a fortune in futures. I don’t think we should trade away our first round pick for a long time.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Mar 26, 2021 11:05:35 GMT -5
I could watch this stuff all day
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 1, 2021 9:16:27 GMT -5
Charlie McAvoy and Matt Grzelcyk are elite.
As of Wednesday, according to Natural Stat Trick, they were one of 90 defensive pairs in the league with 150-plus 5-on-5 minutes together. In this cohort, they are No. 1 in:
Corsi For (65.73) Shot attempts for per 60 minutes (70.92) Shot attempts against per 60 minutes (36.97) Shot share (73.25) Goals for share (80.0) Expected goals for percentage (65.3) Goals against per 60 minutes (0.75) Expected goals against per 60 minutes (1.4) In other words, when McAvoy and Grzelcyk are on the ice together, the Bruins control the puck, put it on net and keep it out of their own at best-in-class rates. Thirty other teams wish to be so fortunate, even the ones with pairings such as Seth Jones and Zach Werenski, T.J. Brodie and Morgan Rielly, Jaccob Slavin and Dougie Hamilton.
The two work their craft in different ways. McAvoy closes on opponents with looping, powerful strides. Grzelcyk eliminates time and space by turning his feet into blenders. When they gain puck control, they excel at applying their hands and vision into snapping accurate exit passes.
But by surging their resources toward a super pair, the Bruins leave their zone-denial and puck-moving supply severely limited on the bottom two duos.
It’s why, aside from occasional offensive play, the best pairing in the league cannot stay together. McAvoy and Grzelcyk understand.
“They get it,” coach Bruce Cassidy said. “It’s been discussed before — that they will be together at times, probably situational. When we’re completely healthy, we’ll use them in offensive blue line situations, maybe at the end of the period. Or when we’re down late in a game. They’ll certainly always see some time together. But as for permanent partners, when (Brandon) Carlo’s in and (Kevan) Miller’s in and (Jeremy Lauzon) at the start of the year, we liked the way they were set up.”
The split is a shame. The two are thick as thieves, dating back to their 2015-16 partnership at Boston University. It is telling that Grzelcyk, who stands 5-foot-9 and 174 pounds, logged his lone NHL fight when he challenged Zach Hyman for dropping his partner.
The wrinkle would be if the Bruins acquire a three-zone left-shot defenseman, their most urgent need. If Mattias Ekholm, for example, became a Bruin, Cassidy would feel freer to put the 30-year-old next to Carlo and reunite McAvoy and Grzelcyk. Ekholm would be a safety valve for Carlo, whose strengths are stoutness and positioning, not puck transportation.
The Bruins would then have two robust pairs. Lauzon and Jakub Zboril would fight it out for shifts on the No. 3 pairing. Because of circumstances this season, it’s where both youngsters may belong.
Lauzon was progressing well as McAvoy’s stay-at-home partner. But then he fractured his left hand on Feb. 21. Lauzon has played in the last two games after missing 13. On Tuesday, he chucked two first-pass grenades, each of which turned into New Jersey goals.
Zboril has had injury trouble too — his own and that of Miller. The two were very good as third-pairing partners, seeing matchups against less dangerous competition. The Zboril-Miller combination had a 50 percent or higher shot share in nine of the first 12 games (75 percent).
But Zboril got hurt on Feb. 12. He played just 5:48 the next game. He sat out the next two.
In the 16 games since his return, all without Miller, Zboril had a 50 percent or better shot share only seven times (43.8 percent). He’s looked jittery in the defensive end next to Connor Clifton, who has straddled the line between rambunctiousness and recklessness.
In the offensive zone, only 22 of Zboril’s 57 5-on-5 attempts have been on goal (38.6 percent). It’s the lowest percentage of any team defenseman with 19 or more appearances. Zboril has zero goals.
“We were hoping to see the growth in other guys’ games, i.e., Lauzon and Zboril, then go from there and try something,” Cassidy said. “It might have been that maybe Lauzon could go with Carlo if they were both cleaner with the puck. But Grizz certainly has a little more ability there. It does give Brandon a guy that can make some plays out of traffic. That was the game plan. After about six, seven, eight games, let’s see how they develop. But right now, with the injuries, it kind of blew all that up. Now we’re almost back to where we started.”
It could be, between now and the playoffs, that Lauzon or Zboril emerges as a reliable top-four defenseman. But at this point, it would not be Cassidy’s first choice to roll either of the two against the top-six forwards of the Capitals and the Islanders. Postseason panic can set in rapidly under the pounding forecheck of Tom Wilson, Alex Ovechkin and T.J. Oshie or Mathew Barzal, Jean-Gabriel Pageau and Jordan Eberle.
It’s why a left-shot defenseman remains their No. 1 priority.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Apr 2, 2021 12:09:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Apr 2, 2021 14:56:37 GMT -5
That’s awesome, that has to be so satisfying.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Apr 2, 2021 15:18:40 GMT -5
That’s awesome, that has to be so satisfying. This World needs a lot more Good Stories, I have a Grandchild His age
|
|
|
Post by kjc2 on Apr 2, 2021 15:32:33 GMT -5
That’s awesome, that has to be so satisfying. This World needs a lot more Good Stories, I have a Grandchild His age I think there’s a lot of great stories out there but most of the focus is always on the bad stuff.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Apr 2, 2021 16:43:16 GMT -5
This World needs a lot more Good Stories, I have a Grandchild His age I think there’s a lot of great stories out there but most of the focus is always on the bad stuff. Very true
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Apr 3, 2021 10:47:11 GMT -5
Six games to the deadline what are the Bruins gonna do ?
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 3, 2021 18:22:36 GMT -5
Six games to the deadline what are the Bruins gonna do ? Depends on the next 5. If they can get Hall for a second rd pick I would do that. I would also go for Savard.
|
|
|
Post by madmarx on Apr 4, 2021 13:22:36 GMT -5
David Pastrnak just four goals from hitting 200th milestone a month+ away from turning 25. Leads the entire 2014 NHL draft class (with Leon Draisaitl in hot pursuit). Currently sits 20th on Boston’s all-time list: Terry O’Reilly is next up (204). 🍝
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 9:12:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 9:55:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 10:08:40 GMT -5
Two seasons ago, Bruins got 41.2 percent of their goals from Marchand-Bergeron-Pastrnak.
Last year: 47.1 percent.
This year: 47.3 percent!
If ever a team needed to trade for secondary scoring...wow.
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 11:43:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 11:45:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SeaBass on Apr 5, 2021 11:47:51 GMT -5
Cassidy on Brad Marchand, "He's a high energy guy. He has a positive mind-set...He's worked hard on his game. I don't think anyone enjoys playing against him."
|
|
|
Post by KSJ08 on Apr 5, 2021 11:52:45 GMT -5
Dustin Brown NO, Jeff Carter, He's STILL Playing, No fv(king way for even I stack to trade!!!
|
|